Core Challenges: Why Traditional Machining Fell Short
The project presented three interlinked challenges that made standard manufacturing methods impractical—each tied to the material’s properties and the design’s complexity:
Challenge 1: Grade 5 Titanium (TC4) Is Inherently Hard to Machine
TC4 titanium has a high tensile strength (up to 1,034 MPa) and low thermal conductivity—meaning heat builds up quickly at the tool-workpiece interface during machining. This causes rapid tool wear, tool chipping, and uneven cuts—issues that become amplified when working with intricate shapes. Traditional lathes or single-axis CNC machines couldn’t maintain consistent cutting parameters, leading to surface defects and dimensional errors.
Challenge 2: Complex Hollow Tubular Design Demands Multi-Axis Control
The shell’s combination of hollow tubing, curved surfaces, and precise cutouts meant no single machining angle could access all features. Traditional 3-axis CNC machines would require multiple setups, introducing alignment errors between features. Even small misalignments (as little as 0.03mm) would ruin the part’s symmetry and fit with internal components.
Challenge 3: Premium Aesthetics Leave No Room for Imperfection
As a visible enclosure, the part needed a flawless surface—free of tool marks, burrs, or discoloration. TC4’s tendency to “grab” cutting tools (causing surface tearing) and heat-induced discoloration made this a major hurdle. Traditional post-processing (like sanding or polishing) risked altering dimensions, so the finish had to be achieved during machining.